Smart contract audit and KYC badges for Web3 projects

What does smart contract audit and KYC coordination cover?

It coordinates two distinct third-party reviews: a technical assessment of specified smart contracts and a KYC review of the people or entity named in the provider's scope. Web3Do manages the workflow and documentation; the independent providers perform their respective checks.

This service is useful when a project is preparing for a launchpad review, updating a data-site profile, or making its security and team-review materials easier to assess. It is not a substitute for legal advice, internal testing, or ongoing security operations. An audit report describes the reviewed code and scope; it is not a blanket statement about every part of a product.

Before starting, gather:

• Contract addresses or the repository and intended deployment chain.
• A description of contract functionality, integrations and upgrade controls.
• The legal entity and team members relevant to a KYC request.
• The data site or launchpad that will receive the materials, if known.

If your immediate goal is a broader tracker presence, see Listings and verification. We can help clarify which review documents are relevant before you request a provider proposal.

How do you choose an audit scope that reviewers can use?

A useful audit scope identifies exactly what the provider will inspect and what will be delivered. Start with the source code version, chain, contract addresses, and a concise description of intended user flows. Then list dependencies such as oracles, bridges, privileged roles, upgrade mechanisms, or external protocols so the auditor can decide whether they fall within scope.

Ask the provider to confirm these items in writing before work begins:

• Which contracts and repository commit are included.
• Whether tests, deployment configuration, and integrations are in scope.
• How findings are classified and delivered.
• Whether a remediation review or follow-up report is included.

An assessment of one code version does not automatically cover later changes. If you modify contracts after review, record the changes and ask the auditor whether they require another assessment. Keep the final report tied to the exact version and addresses it describes. For launchpad preparation, we can coordinate this handover alongside a launchpad listing or a CoinMarketCap listing, without treating the audit as an approval from either platform.

What does a third-party KYC badge show?

A KYC badge or provider-issued status indicates that a named third party completed a defined review under its own process. Its meaning depends on the provider, the people or entity reviewed, and the information the provider is able to disclose. It does not establish that a token, contract, or project is risk-free.

We coordinate provider options and the collection of requested materials, then help organise the outcome for the destination reviewing your project. Before selecting a provider, confirm:

• Whether the review covers founders, directors, an entity, or another defined group.
• What evidence the provider requires and how it handles confidential information.
• What status, certificate, report, or public badge is issued after completion.
• Whether the intended launchpad or data site recognises that provider's format.

Do not send identity documents through informal channels. Use the provider's agreed secure submission process, and share only the material needed for the stated review. For projects asking how to get verified on CoinGecko, first identify the exact profile or verification requirement: a third-party KYC badge and a platform's own review are separate processes. For token supply questions, see circulating supply verification.

Which audit and KYC materials do you receive?

You receive an organised record of the agreed coordination work and the documents the providers issue or approve for release. The final handover is prepared for the destination you identify, so reviewers can find the relevant contract scope, report, and KYC status without having to infer what each document covers.

The exact package is confirmed before work starts. It may include:

• A written scope and provider coordination record.
• The auditor's report and any agreed remediation or follow-up materials.
• Provider-issued KYC status information or a badge asset, where available.
• A concise index connecting contract addresses, code version, review scope, and report.
• Submission-ready links or files, subject to provider and destination requirements.

We do not rewrite technical findings as endorsements. If the report identifies issues, the project should decide with its development team and auditor how to address them, then preserve a clear record of any updated review. For profile changes that accompany the handover, see CoinMarketCap community verification or contract migration and rebranding updates.

How does the audit and KYC workflow run?

The workflow moves from scope definition to provider selection, review coordination, and a documented handover. The schedule is confirmed after the required materials, provider requirements, and review scope are known; the auditor's queue and the time needed to answer technical questions affect the delivery plan.

To keep the work organised, we establish a single source of truth for project materials and track outstanding decisions. Founders can help the process by appointing one technical contact, keeping repository access current, and responding to auditor questions with reproducible details rather than informal summaries.

For practical preparation, confirm these points before the kickoff:

• The chain, contract version, and current deployment status.
• Who can approve scope and respond to technical questions.
• Which team members or entity are expected to complete KYC.
• Where the final report or status will be submitted, and who may access it.

We share progress against agreed milestones and flag missing inputs early. If the project also needs a tracker profile or launchpad submission, coordinate those requirements in parallel where practical; the audit package should not be presented as a platform decision. Related support includes CoinGecko listing coordination and other crypto tracker listings.

What can an audit report or badge not guarantee?

An audit report records a provider's assessment of a defined code scope, while a KYC status records the outcome and disclosure permitted by a separate provider. Neither document automatically approves a project for a data site, launchpad, exchange, or investor. Platform teams set their own evidence requirements and make their own review decisions.

In particular, a data site may assess profile information, contract details, project eligibility, and its own verification criteria independently of an audit or KYC provider. A launchpad may request different documents or an updated review. No coordinator can promise a particular badge, listing status, or acceptance decision; our commitment is limited to the agreed coordination, document preparation, and delivery of provider-issued materials that are made available for release.

Before authorising a provider, check its scope, confidentiality terms, report publication options, and any follow-up work. Before submitting documents, confirm that names, addresses, and code references match the project materials. If a reviewer requests additional evidence, treat that as a separate requirement and agree who will respond. This is also why audit and KYC coordination should be kept distinct from listing profile remediation: correcting profile details does not change an auditor's findings or a platform's review.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Define the destination and scopeShare the intended use, contract version, chain, and any known data-site or launchpad requirements. We map the requested technical and KYC reviews to that purpose.
2. Confirm providers and requirementsReview provider scope, information handling, deliverables, and fees before authorising work. The schedule is aligned once provider availability and required materials are clear.
3. Submit materials and coordinate questionsThe project supplies materials through the agreed channels. We track open requests and route technical questions to the right project contact.
4. Review findings and statusThe independent providers issue their findings or status under their own process. The project decides how to address technical findings with its development team.
5. Prepare the handoverWe organise releasable reports and status materials with the relevant scope and contract references, then provide the agreed package for submission.